Top Top-rated. Photos Top cast Edit. Miranda Richardson Mrs. Wannop as Mrs. Sasha Waddell Glorvina as Glorvina. Janet McTeer Mrs. Satterthwaite as Mrs. Malcolm Sinclair Sandbach as Sandbach.
Sylvestra Le Touzel Marchant as Marchant. More like this. Watch options. Storyline Edit. Story is set against the backdrop of WWI and follows Christopher Tietjens, a top civil servant from a background of wealth and privilege, whose marriage flounders almost as soon as it begins. He falls in love with another woman, but he remains honorable for some considerable time to Sylvia who has several affairs.
On top of this, Chris is dealing with shell shock and partial memory loss that he endures during the war. Action Drama Romance War. Did you know Edit. Trivia Benedict Cumberbatch claimed that his character of Christopher Tietjen was one of the more admirable he has ever played.
His job keeps him from going to the War and he receives a white feather in the mail from those who do not like this fact. He likes to think that he is very much a man of the modernist movement. He is passionately interested in the published works of the leader of the pre-Raphaelite brotherhood Dante Gabriel Rossetti, and mixing with the glitterati of the literary world. He holds literary salons and enters into a love affair with Edith Duchemin, who is also unhappily married to a man of the cloth.
He uses his lazy eye, deep, gravelly exceedingly handsome rich voice and fierce intensity to perfection in a cameo role that is all too short. In a scene with his Bishop. Anne-Marie Duff plays Edith, who is also for a time a delightfully dotty friend of Valentine. All goes well until she is faced with taking her friend into the all-new fashionable bohemian style of world that she wants to inhabit with Vincent, especially when he becomes her husband.
It is then that her previously charming vulnerability fades and she reveals a streak of coldness, one that we can only feel glad that we will never have to encounter. We learn that she is one of the few authors of the time, who does not have her English corrected by Christopher in the margins of her books. High praise indeed, especially for those who constantly struggle with the vagaries of the English language. She brings the frailty and the strengths of her character to life exceedingly well.
His is quite a manic character. They also became outcasts in a society that judged them very harshly for standing up for what they believed in at a time when others were giving service and self-sacrificing for the greater good.
Critics in England lapped up this show when it first aired. It is the most expensive British costume drama on television made in recent years. It is lavish, crisp and full of delicious dialogue, a moving account of society during a time of great and monumental change.
This series showcases a wonderful array of acting talent and will no doubt, stir up a great deal of heated debate about pandering to a particular point of view, without taking others of the time into account.
This is a story you may be tempted to think is meant to stir up what is the best in us all. That is simply not the case. In the end it will more than likely bring out the beast inside, the one we really do not want to face. An interview with actor Benedict Cumberbatch revealed his own sentiments about the refinement of a character he said that he enjoyed playing. I sympathise with his care, sense of duty and virtue, his intelligence in the face of hypocritical, self serving mediocrity, his appreciation of quality and his love for his country.
He is a noble if accidental hero fighting for relevance, a man out of time who is struggling with political and economic injustice. Christopher Tietjens is not one who will, or can survive the uncertainties of the future, unless he compromises both his values and his principles. Will he make the sacrifice as the series progresses? And if he does will it have been worth the waiting for in the end? The society of his time were very unforgiving and if you fell from grace they were pretty harsh at meting out cruel punishment.
This is a program to be savoured. An independent cultural and social historian, Carolyn is an interior designer by trade. She has been involved in the creative sector for over thirty years in Australia; completing interior design projects, creating and producing innovative corporate and not-for profit social profit community events.
She has over that time continuously conducted independent research , while designing, developing, and producing educational art and design history programs in conjunction with renowned specialist colleagues. It is so worth watching — I cannot wait for the next part.
I think Sylvia is tremendous. I am not sure how you can have a subtle complex drama with is simplistic and verbose — perhaps you can but it does sound rather a contradiction in terms. I think it is subtle and complex and the way it is written contributes to that. The acting at every level and from nearly all characters — but particularly the main characters is superb. I am completely addicted.
Cannot sleep before or after, am almost word perfect. I dread the last episode in case there is no happiness for Christopher and Valentine. And, "man-mad" though she appears, Sylvia treats her lovers with disdain: they are not even worth properly tormenting. You had not been for ten minutes in any sort of intimacy with a man before you said: 'But I've read all this before'.
And this too, in a way, is her husband's fault. Their relationship is not just about the infliction and the bearing of pain. Key to an understanding of Sylvia are those rare moments when Ford, a profound psychologist, allows us to consider that she is more than just a vengeful spirit possessed by evil. However infuriating Tietjens might be, however "immoral" his views, he is the only truly mature man she has been with, the only one whose conversation can hold her: "As beside him, other men simply did not seem ever to have grown up.
The more so because he is the only one who can still move her. In the middle of France, in the middle of war, when a venomous old French duchess seems about to derail a wedding, Tietjens, applying intelligence, practicality and his "atrocious" old-fashioned French, talks the woman down. Sylvia has been watching, and: "It almost broke Sylvia's heart to see how exactly Christopher did the right thing. As far as Sylvia can love, she loves Tietjens; and her rage at him is a function of sexual passion.
She still desires him, still wants to "torment and allure" him; but one of the Anglican saint's conditions for her return to the marriage is that he will not sleep with her — a torment in return. As all this suggests, the emotional level of the novel is high, and often close to hysteria.
Only one — Captain McKechnie — seems positively certifiable, but for most, "normality" means a kind of nerve-strained semi-madness. We might expect, for instance, that Valentine, the emotional counterweight to Sylvia, the virgin to her adulteress, who shares so much with Tietjens — they are both Latinists with "bread-and-butter brains", both "without much of the romantic" to them, both lovers of frugality — you would have thought that she at least would have a healthy mind in her undoubtedly healthy body.
But even she finds her nerves constantly on edge and her mind slipping: her head "seems to contain two balls of strings being separately unwound". At one point, she barks an order to her own panicky thoughts: "Steady the Buffs! The middle two volumes of the novel are spent at the western front. Other, more conventional novelists might have set the madness of war against the calm and balm of love and sex; Ford knows more and sees deeper.
War and sexual passion are not opposites: they are in the same business, two parts of the same pincer attack on the sanity of the individual. It is not at first obvious how saturated Parade's End is with sex — with memories of it, hopes for it, and rumours about it.
The novel is masterly on the workings of gossip, and the way it gets poisonously out of hand. By the fourth volume, the rumours about the Tietjens brothers have grown to the point where the pair of them are viewed as "notorious libertines" and Mark said to be dying of syphilis.
The objective reader can count up the number of women the brothers appear to have slept with in their entire lives: three between the two of them.
The central emotional and sexual vortex is that involving Sylvia, Christopher and Valentine. But the lives of lesser characters, even those who are specks at the periphery of the reader's vision, are also endlessly disrupted and twisted by sex.
There is O Nine Morgan, who applies for home leave because his wife is having an affair with a prize-fighter; Tietjens, having heard that the boxer will kill Morgan if he turns up in Wales, refuses the request. So, instead of being beaten to death, O Nine is blown to bits in the trenches: sex gets him either way. Elsewhere, sergeants' wives take up with Belgians; a cook ruins his career by going awol because of his "sister"; an RSM wants a commission because the "bad boys" who "monkey" with his wild daughter back home will be more careful if she's an officer's daughter; while Captain McKechnie keeps getting home leave to divorce, and then not divorcing "That's modernism," growls General Campion.
Sylvia's brusque view of the military is that "You went to war when you desired to rape innumerable women. But no one in the novel gets sex, and sexual passion, right.
Towards the very end of the novel there is a walk-on or rather, ride-on part for Christopher and Sylvia's son. He is just a downy boy, if one beginning to feel the allure of an older woman; but he is old enough to have witnessed his mother at work on various men. And what is this ingenu's early conclusion on the whole matter? Christopher, on a balmy day in the Seine valley, the war for once distant, hears a skylark singing so far out of season that he concludes "the bird must be over-sexed".
Two novels later, his brother Mark, lying awake, hears nightingales producing not their normal, beautiful sound, but something much coarser, which seems to him to contain abuse of other males, and boastfulness to their own sitting hens. It is the sound, in his phrase, of "sex ferocity". Greene wrote that " The Good Soldier and the Tietjens series seem to me almost the only adult novels dealing with the sexual life that have been written in English. They are our answer to Flaubert. One of Flaubert's great developments not inventions — no one really invents anything in the novel was style indirect libre , that way of dipping into a character's consciousness — for a paragraph, a sentence, a phrase, sometimes for just a single word — showing things from his or her point of view, and then dipping out again.
This is a direct ancestor of the stream-of-consciousness narrative so richly deployed by Ford. Much of Parade's End takes place within the heads of its characters: in memory and anticipation, reflection, misunderstanding and self-justification. Few novelists have better understood and conveyed the overworkings of the hysterical brain, the underworkings of the damaged brain after his first spell at the front, Tietjens returns with partial memory loss , the slippings and slidings of the mind at the end of its tether, with all its breakings-in and breakings-off.
The name Freud occurs only once, on Sylvia's lips: "I … pin my faith on Mrs Vanderdecken [a society role model]. And Freud. But Freud is more widely present, if — since this is a very English novel — in a subtle, anglicised form: "In every man there are two minds that work side by side, the one checking the other. Later, Valentine had always known something "under her mind"; Tietjens refers to "something behind his mind"; while General Campion "was for the moment in high good humour on the surface, though his subordinate minds [sic] were puzzled and depressed".
Ford moves between these levels of the mind as he moves between fact and memory, certainty and impression. Tietjens compares the mind to a semi-obedient dog. Nor is it just mind, memory and fact that are slipping and sliding; it is the very language used to describe them. General Campion, one of the least hysterical of characters, is driven to wonder, "What the hell is language for?
We go round and round. The narrative also goes round and round, backtracking and criss-crossing. A fact, or an opinion, or a memory will be dropped in, and often not explained for a dozen or a hundred pages.
Sometimes this may be a traditional cliffhanger: a character left in a state of emotional crisis while the novel ducks off for 50 or 60 pages at the western front. More often, the device becomes something much more individual and Fordian.
An explosive piece of information, murderous lie or raging emotional conclusion might casually be let drop, whereupon the narrative will back off, as if shocked by anything stated with such certainty, then circle around, come close again, back off again, and finally, approach it directly. The narrative, in other words, is acting as the mind often works.
This can confuse, but as VS Pritchett said of Ford, "Confusion was the mainspring of his art as a novelist.
0コメント